Your body is the wondrous crawling forest and the enormous foaming sea,
the dense roaring forces and the open breezes in the yawning void. As it
finds itself existing, it is then upon a circumstance, and it exists as the
circumstance, and looks out upon itself.

In an unlimited infinity there is nothing at all, for everything is. Limitation
then is not depriving, it is the very language of illumination. However,
illuminated infinities are themselves children of illumination; as in, here
there is a witness, so it and a million things are already in place.
Illumination is from where comes the infinity dreamed up to house it, it is
the wind that blows from nowhere bending the light to cast all colours,
inherent unto itself as the light, the bending and the colours, the wind, the
blowing and the nowhere.

When circumstance is clear, you don't seek to institute freedom. Freedom
is the space in which institution and deinstitution occur. Anarchy is the
space in which governance rises and falls. People think they seek freedom,
but it is a change in circumstance they seek. They project utopic visions
inspired by their context, and when circumstance does not accord with their
visions, they quantify the difference and call that limitation, declaring
themselves prisoner. When people incarcerate themselves their fundamental
freedom is undisturbed and playing at incarceration that exists only
circumstantially, so then when they seek freedom, that freedom they seek
is circumstantial also; in truth, when they seek, they are utilising freedom.

When freedom is understood, you no longer try to attain it. Regardless of
what is being featured circumstantially, featurement itself is freedom being
expressed completely as now; in its being so, there births circumstance.
Circumstance is defined by limitation, so apparent limits on freedom are in
fact the very stuff of its expression. The situation of one circumstance
appearing more free than another involves the erroneous conception that
freedom is quantifiably definable and subject to circumstantial particularities;
in actuality, no circumstance is any more or less free than another because
circumstance is nothing but the phenomenal expression of freedom,
unquantifiable, always complete. Mistaking some desired state for freedom
and so projecting freedom away from themselves, people invert their
perception of the relationship between freedom and circumstance, and in
their perception they demote the true nature of freedom to a tally of options
relative to circumstantial context. The true ground of being is forgotten and
replaced with shadows of unfounded circumstantialities that mercilessly
come and go, causing people to live with the paranoiac unrest of one whose
everything rides on the existence of something facing an imminent end.

An Anarchist is one who sees Anarchy all around, and as such, does not
seek to bring it about, but instead, for love of Anarchy, seeks to deinstitute
those elements of circumstance that perpetuate confusion about the nature
of freedom. These elements are not opposed to freedom, they are
expressions of it that perpetually decrease the potential for further
expression. That which is instituted is always freedom creatively expressing
itself in the medium of possibilities crystallized from an infinitude, and as
with creative expression in any medium, it's value is determined not
according to imaginings of fundamental rights, wrongs or otherwise, but
according to it's potentiality to make provision for the development of
aesthetics. Oppression is not a limit upon freedom, it is but a dreary
expression of it. It is dreary in that it is an entropic expression, with limits
in plain view; it is an uncreative utilisation of Anarchy, it is a game
squandering it's players. A river that dams quickly cannot provide for the
deep continent, government that coils around a figment will illuminate only
that. Aesthetic maturation is quantifiable only contextually; so I the author,
contextually embedded, will say that at the time of writing, oppressive
governance falls so far behind the aesthetic avant-garde that the
immeasurability of it's unproductive expenditure is stark.

When nothing is imagined to be at stake, aesthetics as the qualifier of
experience becomes clear, free experience is not postponed in lieu of
some particularity, circumstance is not resented for it's lack of
resemblance to some projected vision, and so when movement occurs,
it does so only for the sake of expounding upon movement, and utopia
blooms from this. Aesthetic drive stripped of subjectivity is the active
encouragement of further exploration into aesthetics, by means of
destroying that which dampens wider creative opportunity and fuelling
that which flourishes it. When aesthetics are unconsciously engaged
they are tamasic, juvenile and superficially expressed as attraction to
and repulsion from phenomena. This situation is encouraged and
exploited from within by those elements of circumstance that, due to
their own entanglements in superficiality, seek to control, for it is only
the confused perception of being apart from freedom that leads people
to so easily acquiesce to and be exploited by oppressive forces.
Tyranny, that great dampener of opportunity, relies wholly on this
confusion, for without it, it cannot be seen to be the quantifier of freedom.

Anarchist action is pointing to the true, omnipresent nature of freedom by
means of subverting perpetuations of confusions regarding it. Art is a
powerful tool of subversion, for it ignores authority except to use restraints
set upon on it as beacons for the avant-garde, and by seeking always for
the new and unexpected, it reconstitutes awareness of the sublime in the
face of existential misunderstandings that forever seek to capture and
diminutise circumstance. The destruction of manipulatively instituted
fictions brings about acknowledgement of responsibility for the quality of
present experience, where before it had been a matter of confusions
involving debts and accreditation. Clearer awareness of the field of
existence as being fundamentally Anarchistic re-accentuates it's
incomparable significance, by disempowering deeply embedded
assumptions about what is really of import, particularly in regard to
cultural norms and expectations, and by empowering an awareness of
self that sees no reason to delegate the qualification of it's own
immediate experience. Circumstantial elements are brought to clarity and
qualified in a space of clear perception, rather than in accordance with
swarming relative implications of meaning and value, being, that story
that was in place when you were born, that dream you grew up in.

Seeing one's own mindscape and it's projections as being inside and
inseparable from the circumstance that features it, and then, with imaginary
biases exposed, responding to circumstance with unfettered clarity and
spontaneity, using the brain's data and all other circumstantial features
effectively and not as blind pivots behind view, this is proper Anarchism,
for it is wholly autonomous and subject to nothing. It is the circumstance
independently responding to itself, it is freedom unobscured. The Anarchist
knows that freedom is not an accordance with any particular utopia but the
birthplace of all circumstance, seemingly utopic or otherwise. Seeing that to
exist at all is to limit infinity, the Anarchist then sees no limitations in
existence, but only illuminated circumstance expressing freedom completely
as such; fundamental masterlessness; Anarchy.

TL;DR

This question of whether or not you are free, for that to be happening, there
needs to be a situation for it to be happening in, and situations are defined
by limits on infinite possibility. Limits, then, do not measure freedom, but
express it; the boulder in the road is not an obstruction, it is a feature of the
road. Where there are no obstructions, freedom is clearly always complete.

When freedom is seen as such, what happens in the world is no longer
valued on whether it increases or decreases freedom, but on how rich an
expression of freedom it is. For example, instituted brutality is a very
shallow expression of freedom, in that it illuminates to a degree eclipsed by
the capacity for it's reception, while diminishing the potential for further
expression. Creative artistry is a very rich expression of freedom, in that
it facilitates unhindered illumination and fills out the capacity for it's
reception, while escalating the potential for further expression and the
expansion of receptive capacity.

Proper Anarchism is working from an awareness of one's own freedom
toward the development of potential for the expression and appreciation of
aesthetics. The Anarchist sees that freedom does not exist without
circumstance defined by limits on infinite possibility; and so understands
that freedom is not the absence of limits but the present moment with all it's
absences and presences, raw, open and unfettered, being expressed by
way of possibilities realized from infinitum and carving it's wake as an
internal mirage.
_______________________________________________________________